11/14/2023 0 Comments Basecamp for mac wants login![]() ![]() ![]() So as general advice - only send those maps to your device - which you will likely need in near future. Also note - the maximum number of map tiles your device can read in is around 2000 or 4000 map tiles - so if you install more - some maps simply will not be read in. You always first install the maps to your PC/Mac - then send them - or send a selection of the map. Please note - you cannot install the maps on the microSD. Last you could generate the gmapsupp.img with mkgmap - then put it on your microSD - there is another tutorial for this, but it's a bit more complicated (only advantage is that it's a bit faster). Otherwise there are no advantages.įor Linux Users - the easiest is to send maps using Qlandkarte GT - please read the Qlandkarte GT tutorial for that. And fastest way of sending is always to the microSD card - in a cardreader - because most Garmin devices devices don't have fast USB chips.Īlternatively for Windows users only - you could scroll down to the explications how to send maps with Mapsource - this has the advantage of having a full screen map selection possibility - while the Mapinstall windows to select the tiles is a bit small. As I assume you are using Garmin Basecamp - the easiest is to just send them from Garmin Basecamp. There are a few possibilities to send maps to your GPS Device. Some Basics about sending maps to your GPS device (Deutsch) Allgemeiner – Support auf Deutsch (members only).Quick Introduction ID-Editor, Josm and Potlach2.Send maps with Basecamp (Mapinstall) or Mapsource.Install Garmin Basecamp (and maybe Mapsource).How to install the Openmtbmaps – Windows.Send Maps to GPS with Mkgmap (Cross-Platform).Screenshots from the very first openmtbmap in 2009.Garmin Transalpin Review and Interesting News.Premium DEM Relief Shading Maps for Garmin GPS devices.Premium Windows/Linux – Velomap Downloads.Premium Gmapsupp.img – directly for Garmin GPS units.Windows/Linux – OpenMtbMap Map Download.I’m afraid the few nice features it has will not be able to save it from its overall lack of functionality, lack of flexibility, lack of integration, and high cost. This allows the user to custom-build solutions that are better suited to their business model and workflow - rather than having to change their processes to fit a stubbornly limited tool.īasecamp is an expensive, outdated tool, based on a lazy development philosophy that has not stood the test of time. But most importantly all the new generation of online tools - like Coda.io, Monday and Notion - have a philosophy of being flexible, feature-full and good integration with external tools. When we look at tools like Plutio - with built-in project management, light CRM, as well as proposal and invoice management - at a fraction of the cost of Basecamp, we start to feel the difference. No, that would be ‘too much’ under the Basecamp ethos. And just forget about any functionality at all that is not squarely related to ticking off tasks in a project - like a built-in address book, or even cost-measuring. Integration with external tools - like Gitlab - is a chore, and will often require hand-coding of an api bot. There’s no in-document commenting, there is no easy, integrated calendar, getting clients and suppliers to participate in projects is cumbersome - compared to Notes, Airtable or even Quip. Chat doesn’t have video or screen-sharing, so you’ll eventually have to go back to Slack, or Skype. In fact, the more you use Basecamp, the more the lack of features and functionality start to weight you down. Do you need to see an overview of where your 10 projects are? Sorry, there’s no general overview. ‘Give them as little as possible’ is what we have here., with even features that are nowadays considered ‘basic’ in any project management software being absent.ĭo you want a Gantt chart to see task dependencies and date slides? Sorry, there’s no Gantt chart, and no task dependency. You’d think that for a product with 15 years of experience in the marketplace, they’d be able to offer a flexible, adaptable tool, with modular features that could be hand-selected to suit a wide variety of teams and use-cases. Unfortunately, the company has a well-known philosophy of ‘underwhelming users’, and consistently ‘delivering less’ than what is asked. The features the app does have are good, and reliable. Being able to upload project files and do some basic version-control in-app is also handy. The built-in team chat is solid and reliable. Their online text editor is well thought-out, producing online documents that are easy to read. For most small teams, this is significantly more than their competitors, for significantly less features.īasecamp is a nice app, with features that show maturity and refinement. ![]() It is subscription-ware, costing a minimum of $100/month. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |